The March 2013 issue of the Canadian Historical Review is now online.
Here's abstract for the first of two legal history articles, by Alain Beaulieu of UQAM:
At the conquest of New France, the British
had already built a long tradition of purchasing Aboriginal land. This policy,
made official in the Royal Proclamation of 1763, was implemented in an
extensive portion of the Canadian territory, but not in the Saint Lawrence
Valley, heart of the former French empire in America, and what is now the
province of Quebec. The British, followed by the Canadian government, adopted a
policy of unilateral land appropriation in that area, dispossessing the
Aboriginals without reliance on a treaty system. This particularity of the
Indian land policy in Quebec has given rise to divergent interpretations that
rest on the same implicit premise that a structuring legal framework existed,
which, when reconstituted, gives meaning to history, either by legitimizing the
unilateral dispossession process or by stigmatizing it. This article attempts
to locate the process of dispossessing Aboriginal land outside the normative
framework imposed by the law. The objective is not to identify a standard to
explain why the British did not conclude treaties, but rather to follow a
process of legal standardization, in which colonial practice is inscribed,
through trial and error, detours, shifts in meaning, and improvisations into a
legitimizing framework.DOI: 10.3138/chr.1060
No comments:
Post a Comment